"The Court observes that, in order to prove the alleged violation of Article 25 of the Convention, both the Commission and the representatives indicated the lack of a simple, prompt and effective remedy for the alleged victim to claim the protection of his constitutional rights. In this regard, the Court considers, as do the Commission and the State, that the application for amparo filed by the alleged victim was not the appropriate remedy in this case, since it was inadmissible in relation to electoral matters. "
OAS (IACHR): Case of Castañeda Gutman v. México, par. 91

Download Document

Case of Castañeda Gutman v. México


Spanish; Castilian