Election Standards | The Carter CenterElection Standards | The Carter Center
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Bibliography
  • Carter Center
EOS EOS

Election Obligations & Standards Database

Summary

There should be impartial scrutiny of the counting process and access to judicial review.


Obligations

  • Right to an Effective Remedy

Election Parts

  • Vote Counting and Tabulation

Issues

  • Right to an Effective Remedy and Vote Counting and Tabulation

Criteria

  • There was impartial scrutiny of the counting and tabulation process, and it was subject to judicial review

Quotes

  • Adequate arrangements shall be made to hear and dispose of all petitions relating to the conduct of elections and announcement of results.
  • State Parties re-affirm their commitment to regularly holding transparent, free and fair elections in accordance with the Union’s Declaration on the Principles Governing Democratic Elections in Africa. To this end, State Parties shall: 2. Establish and strengthen national mechanisms that redress election related disputes in a timely manner.
  • There should be independent scrutiny of the voting and counting process and access to judicial review or other equivalent process so that electors have confidence in the security of the ballot and the counting of the votes.
  • Re-count procedures should be available in case of questionable results.
EOS EOS

Election Obligations & Standards Database

A nongovernmental organization, The Carter Center has helped to improve life for people in more than 70 countries by resolving conflicts;
advancing democracy and human rights; preventing diseases; and improving mental health care.

The Carter Center | One Copenhill | 453 John Lewis Freedom Parkway | Atlanta, GA 30307 | (404) 420-5100

© 2018 The Carter Center. All Rights Reserved.

v2.6.0
The Carter Center The Carter Center
THE CARTER CENTER